The New Horizon

A new world explored with a rational view

Jesus in India?

with 7 comments

Of late, I read about a few articles on Jesus in India and also watched a few documentories on that. There are some points of doubts about Jesus – where he spent his early days and also if he was not crucified, where did he spend his last days.

There are a couple of India-based theories that trace back both this periods to India. Both of these theories are well incorporated in this BBC documentory. The first one is from Nicolas Notovich, which tells about Isha (Jesus) in India. The information he gathered are from a Tibetan monestry in Hemis in Ladakh. In his book The Lost Years of Jesus:The Life of Saint Issa, he drew parallel to Issa and Jesus to trace the lost years of Jesus. Notovitch’s writings were immediately controversial and after the German orientalist Max Mueller corresponded with the Hemis monastery Notovitch claimed to have visited, and Archibald Douglas visited Hemis Monastery, and both found no evidence that Notovich (much less Jesus) had even been there himself, his claims were widely rejected. The head of the Hemis community signed a document that denounced Notovitch as an outright liar. However, his findings were later supported by Swami Abhedananda, a famous diciple of Ramakrishna Paramhansa, in his Bengali translation of Tibetan Gospels named “Kashmir O Tibbate”. An English translation of the Tibetan Gospels are found here. A short and interesting discussion on this topic is found on youtube.

The next one was post-crucification. As presented in the documentory, the Ahmadiyya sect believes that Jesus lived his end days in Kashmir and even he was burried here. The details of the claim was made by Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and published as a book also. Holger Kersten wrote a book on “Jesus Lived in India” in 1995 which broadly supported this view.

The other resources :
1) Read the topic in the article by Swami Nirmalananda Giri – “Some Buddhist historical records about JesusSome Buddhist historical records about Jesus”.
2) An article : Survival of the Crucifixion: Traditions of Jesus within Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism and Paganism by James W. DeardorffDecember, 1993; revised March, 1998.
3) Sole support for Christ of the Church in this reserch paper, but it seems to be to biased to project Jesus as we know in Bible, especially too inclined on non-Christian backgrounds of Notovich and Abhedananda.

BBC Videos courtesy youtube :
Part-1, part-2 and part-3 of the documentory is a well-represented and compiled resouce on crucification and what happened next. This will compell you to find the truth and will shake a human being’s eternal quest for truth.


Written by Diganta

December 25, 2006 at 6:32 am

Posted in History, India, Kashmir, Religion

7 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I am not qualified to say whether it is right or wrong, but the problem with many is they know the conclusion, it’s just a matter of reasons being put behind it.

    I hope it is not one of those.


    December 26, 2006 at 12:16 pm

  2. Yeah, it’s only another effort to find out the truth, let’s not conclude anything out of this documentory.


    December 26, 2006 at 12:18 pm

  3. You’ve become too inactive. I want more posts!


    January 8, 2007 at 2:18 pm

  4. You’ve become too inactive. I want more posts!


    January 8, 2007 at 2:18 pm

  5. I don’t think it as a research. It is simply an imagination to promote “Brand Christianity” by some of the missionaries whose main business is converting people to Christianity in India. I have come across a book circulated in Tamilnadu 4 years back by a local mission which claims that the Jesus is a Dravidian whose forefathers migrated to Israel when, Aryans invaded Afghanistan, Pakistan and Northern India.


    June 11, 2007 at 11:21 am

  6. But this information was sourced not from missionaries, but from Swami Nirmalananda Giri and Nicholas Notovich.


    June 11, 2007 at 11:46 am

  7. there has been ethnic cleansing of the kashmiri pandits…
    so the demography of the region has changed..
    so the plebiscite stands irrelevant now..


    October 7, 2008 at 6:03 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: