The New Horizon

A new world explored with a rational view

The Origin of Life : RNA Hypothesis

with 4 comments

Of late I have been reading books by great scientists. The best one as I found out, is one from James Watson, named as DNA : The secret of Life. I have gone through first three chapters of the book only. It has given me a lot of knowledge on how the life has been evolved on the earth.

The basic mystery that I had prior to reading the book was on the relation between protein and life. The explanation that I got is really interesting. It’s the DNA that replicates a part of it (transcribes) to messenger RNA. The messenger RNA then comes to Ribosome and gets translated to amino acids with the help of transfer RNAs present there. Amino acids are catalyzed by RNAs to build polypeptide bonds among them to generate Protein. But, DNA, RNA and the Proteins are built on nucleotides.

Here the RNA World hypothesis comes into picture. It’s now obvious that RNA has a property to store, transmit and duplicate the genetic information as DNA. It can also produce proteins – the building block of life. According to this hypothesis, RNA was independent initially and later evolved a barrier outside to form later form of life – like bacteria and Amoeba. Carl Zimmer, who’s working on this for long, believes that RNA Viruses are the last common ancestors of life. They evolved into DNA based viruses and since then, the superior system of DNA based life exists.

The most interesting part to me was the role of Natural Selection in the process of forming RNAs. Initially nucleotides (purely chemical substance) were free floating. They were often formed bonds to bind together. but certain sequence of bonds had properties to bind and go to more stable state. As each chain grew longer it attracted more matching nucleotides faster. RNA is one of these giant nucleotide chains. In an RNA world, different forms of RNA compete with each other for free nucleotides and are subject to natural selection. The most efficient molecules of RNA, the ones able to efficiently catalyze their own reproduction, survived and evolved, forming modern RNA. The competition grew and resulted in co-operation between separate RNA chains to produce more and more different proteins. DNA came later and so lipids, carbohydrates and other materials since a collaboration of such materials were more ‘sustainable’ and ‘replicable’.

The main problem of this thesis was the instability of RNA while being exposed to UV Rays. Recent experiments also suggest that the original estimates of the size of an RNA molecule capable of self-replication were most probably vast underestimated, the size can be smaller than one have thought of. More-modern forms of the RNA World theory propose that a simpler molecule was capable of self-replication (that other “World” then evolved over time to produce the RNA World). There are many more hypothesis surrounding this RNA and life but the lack of undisturbed sedimentary rock from that early in Earth’s history leaves few opportunities to test any of these hypothesis robustly.

The idea of RNA world was first proposed in Carl Woese’s The Genetic Code. The term was coined in 1986, by Walter Gilbert.

The origin of life on earth is a mystery that Humankind ought to solve. The proper understanding might give us several advantages over the natural world. We may create our own microbes to fight against the diseases caused by virus and bacteria. We will have much better understanding of each of the building blocks of our own body.

News Reference from BBC :
Creation of Viral life by researchers.

DNA, RNA, Evolution, Origin of Life


Written by Diganta

February 18, 2007 at 8:44 am

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. You might be interested in reading the June, 2007 Scientific American article “A Simpler Origin for Life”, by Robert Shapiro, professor emeritus of chemestry and senior research scientist at New York University (not OJ’s lawyer).

    “The sudden appearance of a large self-copying molecule such as RNA was exceedingly improbable. Energy-driven networks of small molecules afford better odds as the initiators of life”

    He goes on to explain the Replicator First vs. Matabolism First theories.

    uPgRaD3 Z3R0 0n3 A

    June 2, 2007 at 6:23 am

  2. I think the hard copy may go into more detail and includes nice (and helpful) illustrations (unless you have a paid subscription perhaps?)

    uPgRaD3 Z3R0 0n3 A

    June 3, 2007 at 10:02 pm

  3. Hello! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a team of
    volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche.

    Your blog provided us valuable information to
    work on. You have done a extraordinary job!

    Siddid Srivastava

    July 3, 2012 at 7:20 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: