The New Horizon

A new world explored with a rational view

Does the Dam strangulate the river?

with 8 comments

I saw many misconceptions about dams are floating around different facebook communities (link1, link2). There are a lot of pictures showing dams as they are restricting flows of rivers and as if reducing the water supply of the channels. This is nothing but an anti-dam propaganda. Dams do have a lot of bad effects, most of them are ecological and environmental in nature. Besides, an unplanned dam can have a high running cost. But no way they should reduce the water flow downstream, if there are no major river diversions planned along with it.

In Indian subcontinent, most of the dams capture additional volume of water during rainy season and they release them during dry season so that they can achieve significant flood moderation. This is the way India achieves high water usage. India gets only 1750 cubic meters of water per year per capita. Ethiopia gets only a hundred cubic meters less. Although, Ethiopia runs into drought every couple of years and have constant food insecurity, India does not have similar problems. This is because Ethiopia can use only 2% of their water resource while India uses 34% (source : UNESCO). There is a bitter political story for Ethiopia which I don’t want to discuss right now.

Coming back to dams, the true picture of a dam can be revealed only if we observe the history. We need to see how it evolved after the dam was built. The pictures those show dams to be sucking water from the rivers are like ones displayed below.

Zipingpu Dam

Zipingpu Dam

Tarbella Dam, Pakistan

Tarbella Dam, Pakistan

Mettur Dam, India

Mettur Dam, India

These pictures can paint an image of a dam that strangulates a river and reduces the flow downstream. The viewer often gets the feel that the water volume before the dam was “natural” and the dam made it to reduce it to the flow we see coming out of the dam. Even I used to carry similar feelings a few years back when I visited a dam site in Karnataka. I saw a big wall separating the water reservoir from a thin flow of water coming out of it. I thought people upstream might have caused a lot of trouble to the downstream states by erecting it. Later I found out, it went as an win-win for both of those states – Mysore and the British India – as they both gained out of it. The engineer (Sir M. Visvesvaraya) who was the architect of it, was awarded both British and later Indian highest awards. Till date, India celebrates his birthday as Engineers’ day.

So what actually happens when a dam is built in a river? To find out the truth, one needs to see the picture of the dam before and after it is constructed. After a string of google searches, I was able to gather a few images.

Glines Canyon Dam

Glines Canyon Dam, Washington, USA

Mokihinui river dam : New Zealand

Mokihinui river dam : New Zealand

Three Gorges Dam : China

Three Gorges Dam : China

As you see in all theee images above, the true river flow before the dam was built was that of what is coming out of the dam. The dam holds the water when it rains and the river flow goes beyond normal. It releases this excess water when the river is dryer. It acts as a buffer to moderate the natural extremeties observed in the river. In a lot of cases, hydroelectricity is also been produced from the same dam site. I hope the readers are able to understand this properly.

One good example of why dams cause trouble is also depicted in the first image of Glines Canyon Dam, which happened to be located at the same state I live in – Washington. It obstructed natural Salmon habitat. The wiki page says :

“Lacking passage for migrating salmon, its construction blocked access by anadromous salmonids to the upper 38 miles (48 km) of mainstem habitat and more than 30 miles (48 km) of tributary habitat. The Elwha River watershed once supported salmon runs of more than 400,000 adult returns on more than 70 miles (110 km) of river habitat. Today, less than 4,000 adult salmon return each year in only 4.9 miles (7.9 km) of river.”

This forced US Government to restore natural habitat of Salmons through “Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act of 1992”. The dam has been decommissioned though the Salmons are not back yet.

In contrast, the dams in Bangladesh (Kaptai) and India (Damodar) significantly reduced the number of Gangetic Dolphins, who depend on seasonal change in waterflow for migration. However, no steps were taken to decommission the dams associated. In third world, the scenario is totally different – hungry people would have anyway probably killed these Dolphins. There are no public movements at all to save this species – welcome to the reality of poverty in the third world.

Advertisements

Written by Diganta

June 26, 2009 at 6:51 pm

8 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] Does the Dam strangulate the river? […]

  2. Understood. Your post makes lots of sense. But the fear comes from secrecy. Has India provided data to Bangladesh which are credible? Unilaterally India should not take any measures that can cause even a bit of problem for Bangladesh. And people of Bangladesh do not have good experiance regarding water sharing with India. India Bangladesh watersharing is based on mistrust and India should be held responsible for that.

    sujin

    June 27, 2009 at 3:45 am

    • Any kind of water sharing all throughout the world has created more problems that it solved. On the other hand, there are no other option but to share waters in an equitable fashion.

      India of course is the main culprit to breach the trust of its neighbor since it refused to negotiate water for a long time. Similarly, not sharing plans and data is criminal in this case. Thankfully, UN passed the treaty and India was forced to complete the negotiation on the basis of it. However, the attitude of Indian Diplomat shows different pictures.

      However, the issue regarding tipaimukh would not require any water-sharing since this does not take the dry season flow.

      Diganta

      June 27, 2009 at 4:39 am

  3. Sir,
    There are lots of agitation on Lower Subansiri Dam(2000MW) in Assam stating that this dam may act like a WATERBOMB devastating the downstream whenever it breaks. Is this fear has any base? please reply on my e-mail.
    With regards,
    Dr. DC Haloi,
    Assam. INDIA

    Dr. Dipul Haloi

    September 1, 2009 at 11:16 am

    • This is true. But such kind of dam breaks are not frequent around the world. If you provide me with your email id, I can discuss it.

      Diganta

      September 3, 2009 at 4:54 am

      • Dear Diganta,
        Hi, please reply about the matter. We need power but at the same time we have to preserve the nature’s eco system as well as life.
        Waiting for your mail
        Thanking you.
        Dr. DC Haloi.

        Dr. Dipul Haloi

        February 4, 2010 at 7:06 am

  4. You say “But no way they should reduce the water flow downstream”; however you are forgetting the increased evaporation from the larger surface-area of a dam compared with the previously river. This is more substantial than it may at first seem, and can account for a significant reduction in water flow.

    Tim

    September 29, 2009 at 3:08 pm

  5. You completely fail to adress the cause of the river strangulation given by opposers. which is as Tim pointed out evaporation due to a larger surface area.

    for instance

    http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20427394.200-dams-linked-to-more-extreme-weather.html

    Geoamsterdam

    March 17, 2010 at 3:12 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: